Unit-3 Brazil Notes | Comparative Political System DSC-17 | DU SEMESTER 6 NOTES
- Krati Sahu
- 3 days ago
- 12 min read
Introduction
Official Name: Federative Republic of Brazil.
Largest and most populous country in South America; known for natural beauty, including the Amazon rainforest.
Colonized by Portugal in 1500 AD.
Mixed population of Portuguese, Africans, indigenous peoples, and other European and Asian communities.
Portuguese is the official language; other spoken languages include Spanish, German, Italian, and local dialects.
Rich traditions, varied customs, multiple religions, and a multicultural society.
Sharp divisions between rich and poor, and between urban and rural populations.
Major cities (e.g., Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, Brasília) are economically developed; rural regions face poverty, illiteracy, and unemployment.
One of the world’s largest economies; key sectors include agriculture, mining, oil, and manufacturing.
Democratic system based on federalism, constitutional rights, and social justice.
Ongoing issues with inequality and governance imbalances, but supported by a strong constitutional framework.
Brazil has built a democratic structure that addresses its diverse and complex socio-economic realities.

History of Constitutional Development in Brazil
1824 Constitution: Brazil’s first constitution came after independence from Portugal, under Emperor Pedro I. It created a centralized constitutional monarchy. The emperor had excessive powers through the "Moderating Power," allowing him to interfere with all branches of government. Voting was restricted to property-owning males, excluding large segments of society.
1891 Constitution: After the fall of the monarchy and the proclamation of the republic in 1889, Brazil adopted a federal republican constitution influenced by the U.S. model. It established a formal separation of powers and granted autonomy to states. However, real power remained with the wealthy elite, especially coffee plantation owners, and socio-economic inequality remained high.
1934 Constitution: Brought by Getúlio Vargas after political unrest, it introduced progressive reforms, including women’s suffrage, labor rights, and social protections. It attempted to democratize Brazil’s political system and include the working class, but remained short-lived.
1937 Constitution: Vargas dissolved the 1934 Constitution and imposed the "Estado Novo" (New State), creating an authoritarian regime. Civil liberties were restricted, censorship increased, and political parties were banned.
1946 Constitution: Following the end of Vargas’ authoritarian regime after World War II, this constitution restored democracy. It reinforced individual freedoms, civil rights, and the federal structure. However, it failed to eliminate structural social inequalities.
1967 Constitution (amended 1969): Introduced under military rule after a 1964 coup. It centralized power in the executive, restricted political freedoms, and legalized authoritarian practices. Marked by censorship, suppression of dissent, and human rights abuses.
1988 Constitution: Known as the “Citizen’s Constitution”, it marked Brazil’s return to democracy. It is the most inclusive and rights-based constitution in the country’s history, emphasizing democratic governance, social justice, and human rights.
Key Features of the 1988 Constitution of Brazil
Democratic Governance: It guarantees a democratic form of government with a clear separation of powers among the legislative, executive, and judiciary branches. The Constitution ensures that government authority stems from the people.
Federal System: Brazil is a federative republic composed of the Union (central government), 26 states, municipalities, and the Federal District (Brasília). Each level has political and administrative autonomy.
Fundamental Rights: The Constitution guarantees an extensive list of civil, political, social, economic, and cultural rights—including the right to life, dignity, equality, education, health, work, and social security.
Popular Sovereignty: Political power belongs to the people, who exercise it through universal suffrage, referenda, plebiscites, and citizen initiatives.
Secular State: It establishes a secular government, ensuring religious freedom and the separation of church and state.
Human Rights Protections: Emphasizes labour rights, welfare provisions, environmental protections, and protections for women, children, minorities, and indigenous groups.
Independent Judiciary: The Supreme Federal Court (STF) is the highest court and has the power of judicial review. Courts operate independently of the executive and legislative branches.
Political Pluralism: Encourages the multiparty system, freedom of speech, press freedom, and the free organization of civil society.
Amendment Process: The Constitution can be amended, but the process is rigorous. Constitutional amendments require approval by a supermajority in both chambers of the National Congress, ensuring stability and deliberation.
Brazil: Social Dimension of Brazilian Politics
Brazil’s social structure is complex and historically shaped by Portuguese colonialism, which introduced racial hierarchy and systemic inequality.
The population includes whites, blacks, indigenous peoples, and mixed-race groups, with white and wealthy classes enjoying more privileges, while black and mixed-race communities often face poverty, discrimination, and limited opportunities.
Brazil is ethnically and culturally diverse, influenced by African, Portuguese, Native American, European, and Asian heritage, leading to a rich cultural identity but also social stratification.
Economic inequality is a major issue—urban areas like São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro enjoy prosperity, while rural areas suffer from poverty, underdevelopment, unemployment, and poor access to education and healthcare.
Regional and class-based disparities have led to social conflicts and political demands for reform.
Social movements like the Movimento dos Sem Terra (Landless Workers' Movement) and Movimento Negro (Black Movement) campaign for land reform, education, healthcare, and job equality, especially for marginalized communities.
The rights of women and LGBTQ+ people have gained political prominence:
(i) Women's rights movements focus on equal pay, education, legal protections against violence, and political participation.
(ii) Same-sex marriage is legally recognized, and LGBTQ+ rights have seen progress, although social stigma and discrimination persist.
The 1988 Constitution guarantees civil, social, and economic rights, including education, health, social security, and anti-discrimination laws. However, implementation gaps, resource inequalities, and bureaucratic inefficiencies limit the practical realization of these rights.
Local governments in poorer regions often lack resources and depend heavily on federal aid, while wealthier areas continue to advance, creating regional imbalances that influence political agendas and election strategies.
Issues of ethnic identity, especially for black and indigenous communities, remain central to Brazil’s political debates. Despite policy efforts, social inclusion and equity for these groups are still unresolved challenges.
Economic Dimension of Brazilian Politics
Historical Roots of Economic Inequality
Brazil’s high economic inequality originates from its colonial-era social structure, where land and wealth were concentrated among a few elite families.
Portuguese colonization laid the foundation for racial and class hierarchies, which continued into modern times.
These imbalances resulted in centralized control of power and resources, excluding large sections of the population.
Nature of Inequality
Inequality in Brazil is multidimensional, involving:
Income gaps
Unequal access to health, education, and employment
Racial and regional disparities
Urban elites enjoy better public services, infrastructure, and job opportunities, while rural and poor populations face poverty, illiteracy, and lack of access.
Impact on Political Structure
Economic inequality has led to a divided political culture:
Upper classes tend to support conservative and market-oriented policies to maintain their status.
Marginalized groups push for inclusive, redistributive policies addressing their needs.
This class divide fuels political conflict and policy deadlock in government.
Government Responses and Limitations
Policies like land reforms, education investment, and social welfare schemes have aimed to reduce inequality.
However, these efforts face:
Poor implementation
Corruption
Institutional weaknesses
Government resources often do not reach the poorest areas due to bureaucratic inefficiencies and elite resistance.
Role of Social Movements
Movements such as:
Movimento dos Sem Terra (Landless Workers' Movement)
Movimento Negro (Black Rights Movement)
These have advocated for:
Land redistribution
Equal rights
Social justice
Despite raising awareness, these movements face challenges in influencing deep-rooted institutional structures.
Import Substitution Industrialization (ISI) and Its Effects
Brazil followed an ISI strategy to promote local industry and reduce foreign dependence.
While initially successful, it created:
Economic imbalances
Limited industrial expansion
Increased inequality
Resulted in the economic crisis of the 1980s, worsening inequality.
Current Challenges and the Way Forward
Persistent inequality remains a barrier to inclusive development.
Key areas needing reform:
Policy transparency
Effective redistribution mechanisms
Institutional accountability
Democratization of opportunity across racial, geographic, and economic lines is essential.
Political and economic reforms must focus on inclusive growth, equal access to services, and greater citizen participation.
Brazil's Political System
Brazil operates under a federal presidential democratic republic, where power is divided between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Its multiparty system is one of the most complex in the world, with numerous parties representing diverse ideologies, social classes, and regional interests. Political competition, coalition-building, and negotiation are integral features of this system.
Historical Background of Brazil’s Party System
During the colonial era, political power was concentrated in the hands of Portuguese rulers and their allies, leaving little room for public participation.
After independence in 1822, Brazil saw the formation of early political factions—some promoting monarchy or elite rule, others advocating more liberal and democratic principles.
The 1964 military coup suppressed democratic institutions, imposing a centralized and authoritarian regime.
With democracy restored in 1985, Brazil transitioned into a vibrant multiparty democracy, allowing for ideological diversity and broader representation.
Major Political Parties in Brazil
1. Workers’ Party (PT)
Ideology: Left-wing
Founded: 1980s by trade unions and social activists
Key Figures: Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, Dilma Rousseff
Focus: Social justice, poverty reduction, labor rightsChallenges: Involved in high-profile corruption scandals (e.g., Operation Car Wash), which damaged public trust
2. Brazilian Social Democratic Party (PSDB)
Ideology: Centre-right, liberal economic policies
Base: Urban middle class, business sectors
Achievements: Introduced significant economic reforms in the 1990s under President Fernando Henrique Cardoso
Challenges: Declined in popularity due to perceived failure to address inequality
3. Democrats (DEM) / Union Brazil (merged form)
Ideology: Right-wing
Support Base: Business class, conservative voters
Focus: Free market economy, low taxation, reduced government role
Role: Often part of coalition governments with other centre-right parties
4. Brazilian Socialist Party (PSB)
Ideology: Centrist, with roots in socialism and social democracy
Agenda: Pro-poor development, inclusive policies
Tactics: Often aligns with different coalitions to maintain relevance
5. Republicans (PRB)
Ideology: Right-wing, socially conservative
Base: Religious communities, especially evangelical Christians
Focus: Family values, traditional norms, religious freedom
Coalition Politics in Brazil
Nature of Coalition Governance
Due to the large number of parties, no single party typically wins a majority.
Coalition governments are formed to gain legislative support and ensure stability.
These alliances require negotiation and compromise, often between ideologically diverse groups.
Impact on Governance
Positive Aspects:
Reflects political pluralism and broader representation
Encourages power-sharing and negotiation
Negative Aspects:
Coalitions are often fragile and short-lived
Can lead to policy paralysis and administrative delays
Parties frequently shift allegiances for political gain
Key Challenges in Brazil’s Party System
1. Political Instability
Frequent shifts in alliances make it hard to maintain consistent governance.
Long-term policymaking becomes difficult due to short-lived coalitions.
2. Corruption
Widespread corruption scandals (e.g., Lava Jato) have involved leaders across the political spectrum.
These issues have eroded public trust in institutions and politicians.
3. Ideological Fluidity
Many parties frequently change their ideological stance to appeal to broader voter bases.
This leads to voter confusion, reduced accountability, and weakened party identity.
Election System of Brazil
Brazil operates under a democratic and federal republican system that emphasizes universal suffrage, political pluralism, and citizen participation. Governed by the 1988 Federal Constitution, its electoral framework is designed to represent the country’s vast social, ethnic, economic, and regional diversity.
Universal Suffrage and Voting Rights
Brazil has one of the broadest voting bases in the world.
Compulsory voting applies to:
Citizens aged 18 to 70 who are literate
Optional voting applies to:
Citizens aged 16–17
Elderly citizens over 70
Illiterate citizens
Structure of Elections
1. Presidential Elections
Held every four years, the President is elected through direct popular vote.
If no candidate secures more than 50% in the first round, a runoff election is held between the top two candidates.
The President serves as both head of state and head of government, and appoints ministers, but is limited to two consecutive terms.
Key features
Strong mandate of legitimacy
Emphasis on direct democracy
Presidential debates and media visibility play a critical role in influencing outcomes
2. National Legislature
Brazil has a bicameral National Congress consisting of:
Federal Senate (Senado Federal)
81 members, with 3 Senators per state, regardless of population
Senators serve 8-year terms
Elections are staggered: 1/3 and 2/3 of Senate seats alternate every four years
Chamber of Deputies (Câmara dos Deputados)
513 members, elected based on state population
Members serve 4-year terms
Elected via open-list proportional representation—voters choose individual candidates, not just parties
Impact: This promotes multi-party representation, but also leads to fragmentation, requiring coalition governments.
3. State and Municipal Elections
Governors are elected directly in each of the 26 states and the Federal District.
State Legislative Assemblies and Municipal Councils use proportional representation.
Mayors (Prefeitos) are elected through direct voting, with a runoff if no one gets a majority.
This decentralized structure reflects Brazil's federalist nature, where power is shared between national and subnational governments.
Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) and Voting Technology
Introduced in 1996, Brazil’s electronic voting system is globally recognized for its efficiency and transparency.
Key features:
No paper ballots—results are automatically tallied
Faster result declaration—often within hours
Eliminates manual counting errors
Reduces risks of ballot stuffing and fraud
Despite its success, some critics and political figures have raised doubts about security, calling for auditable paper trails. Still, there has been no credible evidence of widespread electronic fraud.
Electoral Commission and Oversight
The Superior Electoral Court (Tribunal Superior Eleitoral - TSE) plays a central role in Brazil’s elections. It is an independent judicial body, not part of the executive branch.
Key Responsibilities:
Supervising national and local elections
Certifying candidates and parties
Monitoring campaign finance
Investigating fraud or violations
Ensuring compliance with the Electoral Code
Electoral Campaign Regulation
To promote fair competition, Brazil has detailed laws regulating campaigns:
Spending limits based on office and jurisdiction
Limits on TV and radio time (allocated free to parties during campaign season)
Restrictions on paid online advertising
Strict rules on donations, especially from corporations (which are now banned)
Mandatory financial disclosures
Challenges in the Brazilian Electoral System
Despite many reforms and innovations, the system faces ongoing issues:
1. Corruption and Campaign Finance Irregularities
High-profile scandals (e.g., Operation Car Wash) have exposed deep corruption involving top politicians and businesses.
Unlawful campaign funding and political patronage weaken public trust.
2. Political Fragmentation
Over 30 political parties are represented in Congress.
This leads to:
Coalition governments that can be unstable
Difficulty passing reforms
Party-switching ("party hopping") by politicians
3. Unequal Access to Media and Resources
Wealthier candidates enjoy greater media exposure and professional campaigning tools.
Smaller parties and grassroots candidates often lack these advantages.
4. Disinformation and Electoral Violence
Use of social media to spread fake news and disinformation (notably in the 2018 elections)
Intimidation and violence, especially in local politics, though federal elections remain relatively peaceful
Recent Reforms and Future Improvements
Brazil has taken several steps to address these challenges:
Ban on corporate donations (2015)
Stricter penalties for electoral crimes
Promotion of fact-checking initiatives
Debate over adding paper trails to EVMs for auditing
New proposals for reducing the number of parties through electoral thresholds
These steps aim to increase efficiency, reduce political fragmentation, and strengthen democracy.
Federal System of Government
Brazil’s 1988 Constitution formally established it as a federal republic, creating a system where sovereignty is shared between the central (federal) government and subnational units, including states and municipalities. This structure reflects the country’s vast size and diversity, allowing localized governance while preserving national unity.
Structure of the Federal System
1. Levels of Government
Brazil’s federation is composed of:
Federal Government (based in Brasília, the Federal District)
26 States
One Federal District
5,570+ Municipalities
Each level has its own executive, legislative, and judicial branches, defined and protected by the Constitution.
2. State Governments
Each state has:
Its own constitution
A directly elected Governor
A unicameral state legislature
Independent state-level judiciary
States are autonomous in managing internal affairs such as:
Public education
Health services
State-level law enforcement
Infrastructure projects
However, they must operate within the bounds of the federal constitution and cannot override national laws.
Division of Powers and Responsibilities
Federal Powers
The federal government handles areas of national interest, such as:
Foreign policy
Defense
National economic policy
Monetary system and currency
Immigration and citizenship
State Powers
States have the right to:
Legislate on matters of regional interest
Levy and collect certain state-level taxes
Oversee public security and civil police
Administer state education and transportation
Municipal Powers
Municipalities, empowered by the Constitution, manage:
Local urban planning
Public sanitation
Primary education and healthcare
Public transport
Collection of municipal taxes
Municipalities have mayors and local councils elected directly by the people, giving them a strong degree of grassroots democracy.
Fiscal Federalism and Revenue Sharing
States and municipalities have independent revenue sources, including taxes such as:
ICMS (state tax on goods and services)
ISS (municipal service tax)
However, there is a mandatory sharing of certain revenues:
A portion of federal taxes (like income and industrial product tax) is redistributed to subnational units through constitutional funds.
While this is intended to promote equity, wealthier states and cities often still accumulate more revenue, leading to fiscal imbalances.
Cooperation and Coordination Mechanisms
The Brazilian federal system is characterized by intergovernmental cooperation, especially in areas like:
National development plans
Public health (e.g., unified health system – SUS)
Education standards
Environmental policies
The federal government often provides financial incentives or support to encourage alignment with national priorities, such as infrastructure projects or social programs (e.g., Bolsa Família).
Conclusion
Brazil has adopted several constitutions since 1822, with the 1988 Constitution being the current one.
The 1988 Constitution guarantees democratic rights and social inclusion.
Brazil follows a federal system with power divided between the central government and 26 states.
States have autonomy but must follow federal laws, especially in foreign policy, defense, and economic regulation.
Economic inequality persists, with issues like land distribution, education, and healthcare inequalities.
Ethnic diversity plays a significant role in political challenges, especially between white and black communities.
Brazil’s party system is diverse, with left-wing and right-wing parties, like the Workers' Party (PT) and Brazilian Social Democratic Party (PSDB).
Elections are majority-based, with direct voting for the president, congress, and local officials.
Tensions exist between the federal and state governments due to unequal resource distribution and political power imbalances.
Richer states exert more influence, leading to political instability in less developed regions.
Brazil faces challenges in achieving economic equality, addressing social movements, and overcoming political corruption.
Brazil’s political system is dynamic, with a constant push for reforms to achieve socio-economic equality and inclusive governance.
Comments