top of page


Updated: Nov 6, 2023


1. Question: What is International Relations (IR), and how is it defined as an academic discipline?

  • Introduction: Provide a brief overview of International Relations as a field of study that examines interactions among states and other actors in the international system.

  • Definition of IR: Define International Relations as the study of political, economic, social, and cultural interactions among states and non-state actors on the global stage.

  • Scope of IR: Explain the interdisciplinary nature of IR, encompassing aspects of politics, economics, history, sociology, and other relevant fields.

  • Key theories and concepts: Mention some of the key theories and concepts in IR, such as realism, liberalism, constructivism, globalization, sovereignty, and security.

  • Conclusion: Summarize the importance of IR as a discipline for understanding the complexities of international politics and cooperation among diverse actors.

2. Question: How did the discipline of International Relations develop in India, and what are the major milestones in its genealogy?

  • Introduction: Provide a historical context of the emergence of International Relations as an academic discipline in India.

  • Early developments: Discuss the initial phase when the study of International Relations was part of broader political science and history courses in Indian universities during the pre-independence era.

  • Post-independence expansion: Explain how the discipline of International Relations gained prominence in Indian universities after independence, reflecting the country's growing engagement in global affairs.

  • Influence of Western theories: Analyze the impact of Western IR theories and scholars on the development of the discipline in India during the early decades.

  • Indigenous perspectives: Highlight the efforts of Indian scholars to develop indigenous perspectives on IR, incorporating regional and cultural specificities.

  • Contemporary trends: Discuss the current state of IR in India, including the growth of research institutions, the expansion of academic programs, and the focus on emerging global issues.

  • Conclusion: Summarize the genealogy of the IR discipline in India, emphasizing its evolution from early beginnings to its current form as a vibrant academic field.

3. Question: How has the study of International Relations in India evolved to address the country's changing global role and challenges? Discuss the adaptation of the discipline to India's foreign policy priorities.

  • Introduction: Introduce the evolving global role of India and its increasing importance in international affairs.

  • Early focus on Non-alignment: Explain how the study of International Relations in India was initially shaped by the country's non-aligned foreign policy during the Cold War era.

  • Economic liberalization and globalization: Discuss how India's economic liberalization in the 1990s and its integration into the global economy influenced the study of IR in the country.

  • Emphasis on regional and global issues: Analyze how the discipline of IR in India has expanded to address regional dynamics, South-South cooperation, and emerging global challenges like climate change and cybersecurity.

  • Technology and security concerns: Explore how advancements in technology and changing security threats have impacted the study of IR in India, including issues of cybersecurity and cyber diplomacy.

  • Future prospects: Discuss the potential future directions of the IR discipline in India, considering the country's aspirations for a larger global role and greater engagement in international affairs.

  • Conclusion: Summarize the adaptive nature of the IR discipline in India, reflecting the country's changing foreign policy priorities and its growing importance in the international arena.

4. Question: How have Indian scholars contributed to the development of International Relations as a discipline, both within India and globally? Discuss the impact of Indian perspectives on global IR scholarship.

  • Introduction: Introduce the significant contributions of Indian scholars to the field of International Relations.

  • Indian IR scholarship: Discuss the works of prominent Indian scholars who have contributed to the development of IR within the country, exploring their research areas and theoretical insights.

  • Regional and global impact: Analyze how Indian perspectives on IR have influenced global scholarship, including contributions to debates on topics like nuclear proliferation, South-South cooperation, and global governance.

  • Cultural and historical lenses: Highlight the unique contributions of Indian scholars in applying cultural and historical lenses to the study of IR, offering alternative perspectives to mainstream Western theories.

  • Diaspora influence: Explore the impact of the Indian diaspora on international relations research and the dissemination of Indian perspectives globally.

  • Conclusion: Summarize the significant role of Indian scholars in shaping the field of International Relations both within India and on the global stage, emphasizing their diverse contributions and influences.

5. Question: How does the genealogy of the IR discipline in India reflect the country's aspirations for a more inclusive and equitable global order? Discuss the role of IR in advancing India's foreign policy objectives.

  • Introduction: Provide an overview of India's aspirations for a more inclusive and equitable global order and its commitment to multilateralism.

  • IR discipline as a tool for foreign policy: Explain how the IR discipline in India plays a vital role in shaping and informing the country's foreign policy decisions and objectives.

  • Advocacy for global norms: Discuss India's efforts, through the IR discipline, to advocate for global norms that address issues such as poverty, climate change, and sustainable development.

  • South-South cooperation: Analyze the role of the IR discipline in promoting South-South cooperation and India's engagements with other countries in the Global South.

  • Regional focus: Highlight how the study of IR in India emphasizes regional dynamics and India's relations with neighboring countries to foster stability and cooperation in the region.

  • Conclusion: Summarize how the genealogy of the IR discipline in India aligns with the country's aspirations for a more inclusive and equitable global order, reflecting India's commitment to being a responsible and influential actor in international affairs.

CHAPTER-2 Theories of IR

1. Question: What are the key principles of Realpolitik as described by Kautilya and how do they differ from the concepts of Realism and Neo-Realism?

  • Introduction: Briefly introduce the concept of Realpolitik, explaining its focus on pragmatic, practical considerations in politics.

  • Explanation of Kautilya's Realpolitik: Describe the main principles of Realpolitik as outlined in Kautilya's ancient Indian text, the Arthashastra. Highlight elements such as power politics, statecraft, and the pursuit of national interest.

  • Comparison with Realism: Discuss the similarities between Kautilya's Realpolitik and the modern theory of Realism, emphasizing shared ideas about power, anarchy, and self-interest in international relations.

  • Comparison with Neo-Realism: Examine the differences between Kautilya's Realpolitik and Neo-Realism, particularly in terms of the emphasis on systemic factors and the role of states in the international system.

  • Conclusion: Summarize the enduring relevance of Realpolitik principles and how they have influenced the development of Realism and Neo-Realism.

2. Question: How does Marxism view international relations, and how does Neo-Marxism build upon or differ from classical Marxist perspectives?

  • Introduction: Provide an overview of Marxism as a theory that focuses on class struggle and the role of economic forces in shaping societies.

  • Explanation of Marxist view on international relations: Describe how Marxism applies its core ideas to the realm of international politics, emphasizing issues like imperialism, capitalism, and class conflict among states.

  • Introduction to Neo-Marxism: Introduce Neo-Marxism as an evolution of classical Marxism, addressing how it incorporates other factors like culture, identity, and non-state actors into the analysis of international relations.

  • Comparison with Classical Marxism: Analyze the similarities between Marxism and Neo-Marxism, illustrating how Neo-Marxism builds upon the foundations laid by classical Marxism while expanding its scope.

  • Differences with Classical Marxism: Examine the departures Neo-Marxism makes from classical Marxism, particularly in its emphasis on non-economic factors and a broader range of social actors in international relations.

  • Conclusion: Summarize the enduring significance of Marxist thought in understanding global politics, while recognizing the contributions of Neo-Marxist scholars in enriching the theory.

3. Question: What are the central tenets of Constructivism as a theory of international relations, and how does it differ from Realism and Marxism?

  • Introduction: Briefly introduce the concept of Constructivism as a theory that focuses on the role of ideas, norms, and identities in shaping international relations.

  • Explanation of Constructivism's core principles: Describe the key tenets of Constructivism, emphasizing the importance of social construction, shared meanings, and norms in the behavior of states and other actors.

  • Comparison with Realism: Highlight the differences between Constructivism and Realism, particularly in their views on the role of material power versus ideational factors in international politics.

  • Comparison with Marxism: Discuss the contrasts between Constructivism and Marxism, focusing on their different approaches to understanding the drivers of state behavior and the sources of conflict in the world.

  • Application of Constructivism: Provide examples of how Constructivism has been applied to various aspects of international relations, such as cooperation, identity formation, and international institutions.

  • Conclusion: Emphasize the significance of Constructivism in offering an alternative perspective to Realism and Marxism, shedding light on the importance of ideas and norms in shaping global politics.

4. Question: How do Realpolitik, Marxism, and Constructivism each explain the origins and implications of international conflicts? Compare and contrast their perspectives.

  • Introduction: Set the context by introducing the three theories and their relevance to understanding the roots and consequences of international conflicts.

  • Realpolitik's view on conflict origins: Explain how Realpolitik attributes conflicts to the pursuit of self-interest, the quest for power, and the anarchic nature of the international system.

  • Marxist perspective on conflict origins: Describe how Marxism views conflicts as a result of capitalist exploitation, imperialism, and competition for resources among states driven by economic interests.

  • Constructivist perspective on conflict origins: Analyze how Constructivism attributes conflicts to the social construction of identities, norms, and interests, which shape state behavior and interactions.

  • Comparison of conflict implications: Discuss the differing implications each theory has on conflict resolution and the potential for cooperation among states.

  • Contrasting approaches to conflict resolution: Examine how Realpolitik, Marxism, and Constructivism propose different strategies to mitigate conflicts, such as power balancing, revolution, or norm diffusion.

  • Conclusion: Summarize the strengths and weaknesses of each theory in explaining conflict origins and implications, emphasizing the importance of considering multiple perspectives in understanding complex international issues.

5. Question: How do the theories of Realpolitik, Marxism, and Constructivism address the role of non-state actors in international relations, and what are the implications of their perspectives?

  • Introduction: Introduce the concept of non-state actors in international relations and their growing significance in the contemporary global landscape.

  • Realpolitik's approach to non-state actors: Explain how Realpolitik primarily focuses on the role of states as the main actors in international politics, downplaying the influence of non-state actors.

  • Marxist perspective on non-state actors: Discuss how Marxism acknowledges the role of non-state actors, particularly multinational corporations and international financial institutions, as instrumental in promoting capitalist interests and exacerbating inequalities.

  • Constructivist view of non-state actors: Describe how Constructivism recognizes the importance of non-state actors in shaping norms, identities, and transnational advocacy networks that influence state behavior and policy-making.

  • Implications of different perspectives: Analyze the implications of each theory's treatment of non-state actors on issues like global governance, human rights, and economic development.

  • Assessment of theoretical gaps: Critically evaluate the strengths and limitations of Realpolitik, Marxism, and Constructivism in capturing the multifaceted role of non-state actors in contemporary international relations.

  • Conclusion: Emphasize the need for a comprehensive approach that considers the interactions between states and non-state actors to understand and address the complexities of global challenges.

CHAPTER-3 Concepts

1. Question: What is sovereignty in the context of international relations, and how has its meaning and application evolved over time?

  • Introduction: Define sovereignty as the principle of supreme authority and independence of states in governing their internal and external affairs.

  • Historical perspective: Provide a brief overview of how the concept of sovereignty emerged during the Peace of Westphalia in 1648, marking the beginning of the modern state system.

  • Traditional understanding: Explain the classical notion of sovereignty, where states were seen as fully autonomous entities with no interference from external actors.

  • Evolution of sovereignty: Describe how the concept of sovereignty has evolved over time, considering factors such as globalization, human rights, and the rise of international organizations.

  • Contemporary challenges: Discuss the challenges to state sovereignty in the modern era, including issues like humanitarian intervention, the responsibility to protect, and the impact of transnational threats.

  • Conclusion: Summarize the changing nature of sovereignty and its ongoing relevance in the context of an interconnected world.

2. Question: How is the international order established and maintained in the field of international relations? Discuss the role of major powers and international institutions in shaping the global order.

  • Introduction: Define international order as the arrangement of power, norms, and rules that guide state behavior in the international system.

  • Role of major powers: Discuss how major powers play a crucial role in establishing and maintaining the international order, influencing decision-making, and shaping global norms and institutions.

  • Power dynamics: Analyze how power disparities among major states can lead to the emergence of different types of international orders (e.g., unipolar, bipolar, multipolar) and their implications for stability and conflict.

  • Role of international institutions: Describe how international institutions, such as the United Nations, World Trade Organization, and regional organizations, contribute to maintaining the international order through cooperation, conflict resolution, and rule-based governance.

  • Challenges to the international order: Address the challenges and disruptions to the existing international order, such as rising populism, nationalism, and great power competition.

  • Conclusion: Summarize the complex interplay between major powers and international institutions in shaping the international order and the ongoing efforts to adapt it to contemporary challenges.

3. Question: Explore the concept of state sovereignty versus human rights in international relations. How does the tension between these two concepts manifest, and what are the implications for global governance?

  • Introduction: Introduce the concepts of state sovereignty and human rights, highlighting their importance in international relations and their potential for conflict.

  • Sovereignty and non-interference: Explain how traditional notions of state sovereignty emphasize non-interference in a state's domestic affairs, which may clash with international efforts to protect human rights.

  • Humanitarian intervention: Discuss the debates surrounding humanitarian intervention, where states or international organizations intervene in the affairs of a sovereign state to protect human rights.

  • Responsibility to Protect (R2P): Explore the emergence of the R2P principle, which seeks to reconcile state sovereignty with the responsibility to prevent and respond to mass atrocities.

  • Implications for global governance: Analyze the implications of the tension between state sovereignty and human rights for global governance, including challenges in enforcing human rights norms and promoting international cooperation.

  • Conclusion: Summarize the ongoing dilemma between state sovereignty and human rights, and the importance of finding a balance that upholds human rights while respecting the principles of state sovereignty.

4. Question: How does the emergence of non-state actors influence the traditional notion of sovereignty and contribute to the shaping of the contemporary international order?

  • Introduction: Introduce the concept of non-state actors, such as multinational corporations, non-governmental organizations, and terrorist groups, and their growing significance in global affairs.

  • Challenging state-centric sovereignty: Discuss how non-state actors can challenge the traditional state-centric notion of sovereignty by operating across borders and influencing state behavior and decision-making.

  • Transnational issues: Explore how non-state actors play a crucial role in addressing transnational challenges, such as climate change, terrorism, and global health crises, which require collective responses beyond state boundaries.

  • Impact on international order: Analyze the ways in which non-state actors contribute to shaping the contemporary international order by advocating for new norms, creating alliances, and influencing international institutions.

  • Responses from states and institutions: Discuss how states and international organizations respond to the growing influence of non-state actors and the measures taken to regulate their activities.

  • Conclusion: Summarize the transformative impact of non-state actors on the concept of sovereignty and their role in shaping the dynamics of the contemporary international order.

CHAPTER-4 Exploring the future trajectories

1. Question: How do traditional theories of international relations marginalize the Global South? Discuss the limitations of these theories in explaining the perspectives and experiences of Southern states.

  • Introduction: Provide an overview of traditional theories of international relations, such as Realism, Liberalism, and Constructivism.

  • Marginalization of the Global South: Explain how these traditional theories tend to focus on the experiences and perspectives of powerful Western states, often overlooking the unique challenges and contexts faced by Southern states.

  • Eurocentrism in theory: Discuss the Eurocentric biases present in many traditional theories, which may lead to an underrepresentation of the Global South's contributions and agency in world affairs.

  • Ignoring historical contexts: Analyze how traditional theories often neglect the historical legacies of colonization, imperialism, and systemic inequalities that continue to shape the Global South's interactions with the international system.

  • Inadequate development of Southern perspectives: Highlight the need for including more diverse voices from the Global South in shaping international relations theories to ensure a comprehensive understanding of global dynamics.

  • Conclusion: Emphasize the importance of incorporating perspectives from the Global South to create more inclusive and relevant theories of international relations.

2. Question: What are the key dimensions of the Global South in international relations? Discuss the economic, political, and social aspects that characterize the South's role in the international system.

  • Introduction: Define the concept of the Global South as a grouping of countries from Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the Caribbean that share common economic and political challenges.

  • Economic dimensions: Explore the economic characteristics of the Global South, such as high levels of poverty, reliance on commodity exports, and efforts to address development and inequality issues.

  • Political dimensions: Discuss the political dynamics in the Global South, including concerns about governance, democratization, and the quest for greater representation in international institutions.

  • Social dimensions: Analyze the social aspects of the Global South, such as cultural diversity, human rights challenges, and the impacts of migration and refugee crises on regional and global stability.

  • Regional perspectives: Highlight the diversity within the Global South, considering the unique regional dynamics and interactions among countries in Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the Caribbean.

  • Conclusion: Summarize the multifaceted dimensions of the Global South and its significance in shaping the contemporary international system.

3. Question: How can Asian International Relations offer insights into a more inclusive and representative Global International Relations? Discuss the potential of Asian perspectives in enriching the field of international relations.

  • Introduction: Introduce the emergence of Asian International Relations as a subfield that focuses on Asian perspectives and experiences in international relations.

  • Cultural and historical context: Discuss how Asian International Relations draws on cultural and historical traditions to offer alternative ways of understanding global politics beyond Eurocentric perspectives.

  • Non-Western theories: Explore the contributions of Asian scholars and intellectuals in developing non-Western theories that address global issues from Asian viewpoints.

  • Regional cooperation and integration: Analyze how Asian International Relations emphasizes regional dynamics and cooperation, shedding light on the potential for collective solutions to global challenges.

  • Implications for Global IR: Discuss how incorporating Asian perspectives can lead to a more inclusive and representative Global International Relations, enabling a broader understanding of the world and its complexities.

  • Conclusion: Emphasize the value of Asian International Relations in diversifying the study of global politics and fostering a more comprehensive understanding of international relations.

4. Question: How do power shifts in the Global South impact the traditional understanding of international relations? Discuss the rise of Southern powers and its implications for the existing international order.

  • Introduction: Introduce the concept of power shifts and changing dynamics in the Global South, highlighting the rise of countries such as China, India, Brazil, and others as significant players in the international system.

  • Impact on traditional theories: Discuss how the emergence of new Southern powers challenges traditional theories' assumptions about power, influence, and state behavior, necessitating adaptations in theoretical frameworks.

  • Unipolar, bipolar, or multipolar?: Analyze how the growing influence of Southern powers may lead to shifts in the global power structure, potentially altering the current unipolar or Western-dominated order.

  • Diplomacy and cooperation: Explore how the rise of Southern powers fosters new forms of diplomacy and regional cooperation, shaping international relations beyond traditional Western-led frameworks.

  • Challenges and opportunities: Discuss the challenges and opportunities presented by power shifts in the Global South, such as potential conflicts, competition, and the potential for more inclusive global governance.

  • Conclusion: Summarize the transformative impact of the rise of Southern powers on traditional international relations paradigms and the potential for a more multipolar and diverse global order.

5. Question: How can Asian International Relations serve as a pathway to a more comprehensive and interconnected Global International Relations? Discuss the potential for Asian perspectives to bridge gaps and foster collaboration among diverse actors.

  • Introduction: Introduce the concept of Asian International Relations as a platform for diverse Asian perspectives to contribute to global discussions and interactions.

  • Asian values and norms: Discuss how Asian International Relations can offer insights into regional values and norms that have the potential to influence and shape global norms and practices.

  • Soft power and cultural diplomacy: Analyze how Asian countries' soft power strategies, including cultural diplomacy and development aid, contribute to building bridges between regions and facilitating cooperation.

  • Economic integration: Explore how Asian economic initiatives, such as the Belt and Road Initiative, promote connectivity and collaboration across different regions and continents.

  • Multilateralism and global governance: Discuss how Asian countries' engagement in multilateral institutions can foster a more inclusive and effective global governance system.

  • Conclusion: Summarize the role of Asian International Relations as a pathway to a more interconnected and comprehensive Global International Relations, emphasizing the potential for collaboration and cooperation among diverse actors.

2,510 views0 comments


Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
bottom of page